|
Professional Interpreters
|
Verified fluency in English and community language
|
Expensive
|
| |
Well organised service for booking interpreters
|
No facility to help with participant recruitment
|
| | |
Difficult to find interpreters for some languages
|
| | |
Some problems with interpreters answering for participants
|
|
Bilingual/Bicultural Students
|
Provides practical experience for students in their field of study
|
Required intense supervision
|
| |
Often have good community networks to recruit interview participants
|
Limited professional experience on which to draw if client became distressed
|
| |
Often speak community languages where there is limited access to interpreters
|
Potential for social desirability bias as most women interviewed knew the student personally
|
| | |
Level of language proficiency in community language was not accredited
|
|
Overseas- trained Health Professionals
|
Level of fluency in community language often recognised by an overseas university
|
Required some supervision
|
| |
Good understanding of confidentiality, boundaries & referral processes
|
Required intensive assistance with aspects of the Australian employment system
|
| |
Good professional experience on which to draw if participant became distressed
|
Potential for social desirability bias as most women surveyed knew them personally
|
| |
Often have experience in / interest in research, so already understand research protocols
| |
| |
Good community networks to find women to interview
| |
|
Community- sector Bilingual Workers
|
Good understanding of confidentiality, boundaries, referral processes
|
Heavy workload, so difficult to find time to interview new arrivals
|
| |
Good professional experience on which to draw if participant became distressed
|
Potential for social desirability bias as most women surveyed already knew them
|
| |
Good community networks
| |
| |
Require minimal supervision
| |
